Examples of synchronicity strings (seriality) from real life.

A practical example of synchronicity strings (seriality) with my oldest son Kim (now 30 y.).

1st move-study connective string (horizontal yellow bands): in August 1990 (A), my oldest son Kim moves in with me from his mother at the age of 18 to study in Antwerp. Next 3.2 cycle in November 1993 (H), he comes back from the army (UN Yugoslavia) and starts working as a sales manager in my air-conditioning company. 3.2 y. later, in March 1997 (K), and during the 3 y. 'NO CONTACT' period, he drops by unexpectedly for a short visit. Next 3.2 cycle, in April 2000 (N), he comes back from South-Africa (working independent as a travel manager), stays two weeks with me and is interested in me learning him how to build an Internet site before leaving to Canada for his next assignment. Energy: breaking up and rejoining, learning, starting, co-operate.

(Click the graphic to get a larger one).

2nd move string: In January 1991 (B), I move away from him to live with my 3rd wife while he stays living in the company premises. 9.6 years later at Sept. 2000 (O), Kim and Pieter move in with me almost together. Pieter stays 2 months and Kim 7 months (more about this in note below). Energy: moving.

3rd work-life change string: In June 1991 (C), he stops his study, helps during summer with the rebuilding of my house and from Sept. on (D) - right on his birth line - he starts working as an assistant to the technical air-co team in my company, to leave for his service in the army in Dec. 1991 (E). 9.6 years later, in May 2001 (Q), he leaves after living 7 months with me to start a completely new life direction and job. Energy: living-working with his father and leaving for main phase in life.

4th move-sales string: After an small and short export initiative, initiated at (F), he comes back from Switzerland In March 1993 (G) and takes up a short assignment to finalise this export project, with a very nice result. 3.2 y. later in March 1996 (I) he moves with me to new company premises (after the failure of the old firm) and realises the sale and follow-up of a very big air-co project for a good price. 3.2 y. later, he writes me a letter in the "NO CONTACT" period. Energy: succeeding, bringing something important home, making contact again.

5th leaving-meeting string: in June 1993 - just below (G) and "Export 2" - after finalising a one month and one-time export project - he leaves my air-conditioning company to join the army again (UN peace assignment in Yugoslavia). 3.2 y. later, in July 1996, he leaves me after a fundamental and painful conflict, 6 months after the collapse of my 1st company and stays away until Sept. 1999, 3.2 y. later at (M). Then we meet again and become very close, ironing out the old pain. Energy: moving, breaking-up and rejoining, making contact, big restructuring.

Note: remark also the peculiar period between (B) and (C) and as well (O) and (Q), indicated with a vertical magenta bar. This is the period between conception and birth line at the end of the 19.2 and the 28.8 time period (2 and 3 times the main 9.6 cycle). The first time, a few months after coming to me, I leave him to live with my 3rd wife. The next period, 9.6 years later, he comes back again and stays a whole "pregnancy" period with his father...

This is no coincidence but something regularly observed in my therapy practice. At age of 28, very often children seek closer contact with their father, in contrast with the close "contact" with their mother - 28.8 years before - during the initial pregnancy period...

I am also very curious to see what will come out in the Fall of 2002 at (R)? This line has something to do with meeting or co-operating again?...

Extra Note: In May 2000, when he left for Canada after staying 2 weeks with me (N), I wrote the following text in the May Newsletter: "I think I will meet him again at the end of August, beginning of September or around Christmas 2000, last date most probable (to me). At the moment, there is NO single schedule available to forecast his next visit. It can be after 3 months as well as after 2 years (his words)"...

We see his moving in in Sept. 2000 at (O) and "again" when his intended journey to the USA in Dec. 2000 (P) became cancelled, staying with me an extra 5 months!

Marc and his 2 latest cars - The Cosmos is humorous as well.

The following aligned string of coincidences is very peculiar and hilarious as well. In Marc's life, ALL gas shortage and car breakdowns happen on one neat, almost straight line! Except one event...

It all starts in June 1981 (A) when he accidentally locks his door with the engine running and the keys inside. 3.2 years later in Summer 1994 (B) his engine breaks down. A further 3.2 years later in Oct. 1987 (C), his car is badly rusted, he sells it and stays almost 5 years without. So in Jan. 1991 (D) he doesn't have a car, obvious no "car event" can happen. However, 1 year later at (E) he again buys a car and 6 months later in July 1992 (F) he experiences almost the same trouble as in (A): he closes the trunk while the keys are inside!

(Click the graphic to get a larger one)

Being dutiful, in March 1994 (G) he arrives again on the main "car events line" and suffers a diesel shortage in Luxembourg. Than, 3.2 y. later, in May 1997 (H) in Croatia the same. The next cycle in 2000 on a summer evening in Belgium, his fuel is running low. The 1st station is open but has temporarily no diesel, the 2nd station has no bank card terminal and the 3rd station is closed... resulting finally in a diesel shortage!

He remembers no other gas shortages in his life... But there is more: the missing event at (D) is neatly filled in at (F), half a cycle of 3.2 y. later = 1.6 y. and this is right on the "opposite" position of the main "car line"! It is as if the Cosmos held the event at (D) in "backorder" till the occasion he possessed again a car and dutifully "served" an extra difficulty, very similar with the one of 9.6 years before (D) at (A). The opposite line area is thought to be the "anti energy" of the main line area, but in a way very similar. The 9.6 y. cycle is the most important and prominent one in the range of life cycles.

Note: What will happen in the fall of 2003? Shouldn't he take with him a small container with some diesel?

Luk (#1) in his "city boy" youth, gaining tremendous power and initiative.

The first string takes place just above the birth line (double black line). At the age of 13 at (A), Luk (a frail city boy) experienced a tremendous summer holiday at a farm, in becoming very self-confident and active and he gains 10 cm (4 inches) in height and 15 Kg (33 pounds) in body weight in those 2 months!!. 3.2 years later at (B), he is back on the same farm and another one as well, having again a marvellous time. One cycle further at (C) he moves back to his parents, experiences now lots of difficulties and a few months later he moves to his lover and gains a lot of freedom again. Then, at (D) his first job is offered to him, first 2 months being difficult, than things are going better. Again, a cycle later (E) he is offered a far better job, promoting to shop manager 4 months later. Still on the go, he starts at (F) an independent initiative in the same field, culminating in a move at (G) in 1978, the founding of his own shop and becoming REALLY active...

Note: the whole string happens just before his birth line (double horizontal line). This area corresponds with the earlier pregnancy period and is usually rather experimental, being a very nurturing area for setting things straight in the inner strength of the person.

Luk (#2) as an adult of 35, failing in 1982 and completely revamping his life over next 19.2 years.

He gets overoptimistic, makes some very bad decisions during next 4 years and at the age of 35 at (A) he ultimately fails. After a lot of turbulent initiatives, he gets a decent, hard working, low wage job at (B). Than, 3.2 years later, he finds a very nice commercial niche, while working for company "A" and is gaining big bucks. While still working for "A" (but the management is making very bad decisions), he founds a competitor company "B", switches over and some time later company "A" fails. At (E) he stops the exploitation of company "B", sells out the stocks without loss and starts another company in a new field. Things are developing but at (F), he again does a limited project with the boss of the books company at (B) but this isn't fruitful. Next cycle, he gains full momentum and becomes well known in a new direction.

Note: It all happens just after the birth line, usually a rather active and positive period in the course of a life. This area is the field for setting up something new, activating new directions or initiatives. Note also the distinct switch from before his birth line (previous section on this page) and after his birth line (this section). Note also the 9.6 y. separation between the 2 bankruptcies (A) and (D). Over 2 cycles of 9.6 years, he completely reorganised his life.

Extra Note: It was his life that became available to my research in the very early days in 1999, when I was figuring out the correct alignment of the 3.2 years life cycle, thought in the beginning to be connected with Mercury but later-on Venus proved to be the main backbone.

Rik (me, the writer) with a lot of strings - before and after some very bad mistakes in my life.

An example of the complex evolution in a life: In the first cycle of the graphic (at left), I live an initially free and active period during years of tremendously fruitful business ("Before"). Than, I make 3 very important, dreadful mistakes: buying a far too large company premises (C), hiring an incompetent chief sales manager and ignoring the oncoming economical crisis (D). This results in my firm sinking deeply into a series of bad developments, with a bankruptcy following after 5 years. "Cleaning it up completely" requires a total of 3 cycles - about 10 years.

Move connection: at (E) I move the company to its new premises. 9.6 y. later I move privately (R).

Sacking string: at (B) I think for a while of sacking my secretary but don't do it. At (F), I sack my best sales representative - badly influenced by the chief sales manager, hired 5 months earlier. One cycle later at (I) I threaten sacking someone but don't do it. Again one cycle later (M), I myself get temporarily some troubles in a teaching contract. In the last cycle at (S), after the private move, I have a quarrel with my painter about the price being much higher than agreed upon. He gets a decent amount paid and is dismissed ("sacked").

(Click the graphic to get a larger one).

Visual equipment string: I buy my first computer in Feb. 1989 (A). This is just very loosely related to a cycle later with the total loss of a second-hand colour copier at (G) - value of $ 3,000. Than it goes on with lots of difficulties with a new computer system at (J). Than, 3.2 years later, I buy a new TV set (old one beyond repair). One cycle further, my old scanner breaks down and needs replacement (T). The real connection here is one over 9.6 years ( 3 cycles) with the copier at (G) = almost identical technology.

Financial crisis string: Due to the bad mistakes at (C) and (D), my company starts having fundamental financial troubles at (H). One cycle later, I buy out my associate at (L), in a big crisis. When being self employed 3.2 years later (Q) as a psychotherapist, I suffer a difficult mental-emotional period of 2 weeks. One cycle later, my busy therapy practice suddenly - and during 2 months - receives almost no new clients. This results in a small financial setback, solved very soon.

The short homeopathy string: In Oct. 1995 (K), I start consulting regularly with a homeopath. One cycle later at (N), I interrupt the visits for 3 months. Next cycle, in Feb. 2002, the homeopath and me are both rather unhappy with the going on of the sessions and they are halted.

"The Hague" connection: In Dec. 1998, right after the discovery of the 3.2 years cycle, I visit a freelance author in The Hague (capital of the Netherlands) to propose him to write an article about my system, turning out without results. A little longer than one cycle later, in May 2002 (W), I am contacted by a freelance reporter, investigating this site and my life cycles system. It turns out the American woman (Belgian born) lives and works in The Hague and I pay her a visit in July 2002. Prospects about a publication of an article are still inconclusive these days...

Note: you can clearly see that after making some very important mistakes, and by introducing a lot of strain in my life, suddenly a few peculiar synchronicity strings (seriality) are formed out of the blue. Due to the complete overhaul I made about my life in-between, these strings get "weakened" as the breakdown of the 5 years old scanner after the move compared with 9.6 y. earlier the second-hand colour copier - value of $ 3,000 - shows. The original "negative tendency" prevails in a "watered down version" but is not harmful anymore.

More examples to follow soon - texts not edited yet...